In this insightful discussion, psychologists Fran Shure and Marti Hopper delve into the psychological mechanisms that contribute to the widespread resistance to acknowledging alternative perspectives on the events of September 11, 2001. Drawing from their extensive backgrounds in clinical psychology, they explore concepts such as cognitive dissonance, denial, and the emotional discomfort associated with confronting challenging truths. Their analysis sheds light on why many individuals and institutions continue to uphold the official narrative despite compelling evidence to the contrary. This conversation offers a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between psychology and belief systems in the context of 9/11.